SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
57
57
Mar 2, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 57
favorite 0
quote 0
of pier 23 and the south apron of pier 19 improved as part of america's cup. for the cruise terminal, we're looking to complement that by having the cruise terminal then deliver the south side of pier 23 and the north side of pier 19. that would enable the aprons on 19 and 23 to be improved. in addition, for pier 27 and 29, the connector building between pier 19 and 23 is a non historic structure. there is an opportunity to create major views in public access to the bay. that is included as part of the proposal, too. the improvement of 19 and 23, the removal or modification of 19.5 are part and parcel of our thinking about -- run that transferred of development in the funding strategy that has been discussed. if we were able to accomplish those planning process these that i just described in the previous slide and be able to identify an alternative open water basin location by 2015, we would be able to effectively replace the removal requirement there is a kin time when all of this needs to take place. visually this is what we're talking about, 1923 and 19.5 c
of pier 23 and the south apron of pier 19 improved as part of america's cup. for the cruise terminal, we're looking to complement that by having the cruise terminal then deliver the south side of pier 23 and the north side of pier 19. that would enable the aprons on 19 and 23 to be improved. in addition, for pier 27 and 29, the connector building between pier 19 and 23 is a non historic structure. there is an opportunity to create major views in public access to the bay. that is included as...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
115
115
Mar 28, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 115
favorite 0
quote 0
at pier 70, which is by -- $5.7 million. the epa and sfpuc combine forces for the project. the portland after the commission the project for construction services at pier 27. the eir requires the report, and the board in certifying the appeal of the eir also requires the port to install this shoreside project. even without the ordinance before you today, that particular strategy that we have crafted with the public utilities commission, this would be the option for the board to do. >supervisor avalos: eventually, we will have shoreside power at the cruise terminal and that will be reconditioned, correct? >> yes. but what i am saying is, yes, we are obligated to reconnect the pure 27 shoreside power facility. but because of ceqa, even if we do not get the ordinance approved by the board and cannot execute this strategy by b.a.t., -- bae, we would be required to install the shoreside power at pier 70. supervisor avalos: in other words, they are providing for their own initiatives. >> yes, the reason for the shoreside power at
at pier 70, which is by -- $5.7 million. the epa and sfpuc combine forces for the project. the portland after the commission the project for construction services at pier 27. the eir requires the report, and the board in certifying the appeal of the eir also requires the port to install this shoreside project. even without the ordinance before you today, that particular strategy that we have crafted with the public utilities commission, this would be the option for the board to do....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
206
206
Mar 5, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 206
favorite 0
quote 0
of pier 23 and the south apron of pier 19 improved as part of america's cup. for the cruise terminal, we're looking to complement that by having the cruise terminal then deliver the south side of pier 23 and the north side of pier 19. that would enable the aprons on 19 and 23 to be improved. in addition, for pier 27 and 29, the connector building between pier 19 and 23 is a non historic structure. there is an opportunity to create major views in public access to the bay. that is included as part of the proposal, too. the improvement of 19 and 23, the removal or modification of 19.5 are part and parcel of our thinking
of pier 23 and the south apron of pier 19 improved as part of america's cup. for the cruise terminal, we're looking to complement that by having the cruise terminal then deliver the south side of pier 23 and the north side of pier 19. that would enable the aprons on 19 and 23 to be improved. in addition, for pier 27 and 29, the connector building between pier 19 and 23 is a non historic structure. there is an opportunity to create major views in public access to the bay. that is included as...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
51
51
Mar 23, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
a number of removal projects a pier 64. between the pier 1 and the very building. the new end wall at 29 and storm water improvements at the end of pure 27-29, and relocating short power. that was another obligation that was on the event authority side of the location. as well as pier 29 substructure repairs i mentioned earlier. most of the improvements have a useful life of 30 years. they are good, capital investments. we have gone through the investments of scoring the projects using the port capital plan scoring process, and they all score quite well. they fulfill a number of either permitting and regulatory obligations or other port- mission oriented goals such as maritime breathiirthing and the. the port has sufficient deck capacity to finance these obligations, largely because the poor will retain a lot of the properties that would have been leased on a long-term basis to the event authority, so we're seeing the port said capacity is growing from $65 million to $89 million. largely off because we will keep the rents in a long-term. the added capacity would be
a number of removal projects a pier 64. between the pier 1 and the very building. the new end wall at 29 and storm water improvements at the end of pure 27-29, and relocating short power. that was another obligation that was on the event authority side of the location. as well as pier 29 substructure repairs i mentioned earlier. most of the improvements have a useful life of 30 years. they are good, capital investments. we have gone through the investments of scoring the projects using the port...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
178
178
Mar 21, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 178
favorite 0
quote 0
for pier 70 be activity restrictions would be things that probably would not happen at pier 70 any way like rolling produce for consumption in native soil or allowing livestock grazing and native soil. ground water could not be used for domestic water supply, which at pier 70 it is failing ground water, and that would not be happening. ground water use would be limited to watering during construction. soil and groundwater would have to be managed in accordance with our risk management plan. the risk management plan is a key component of the remedy. a risk management plan will be developed to support consultants in conjunction with the water board. we will be developing a plan that describes all of the ad industry the measures that need to be in place at pier 70 in order to ensure the long-term integrity of the cap and that the site is managed in accordance with things like storm water pollution prevention, thus control, and worker health and safety protections. -- dust control, and worker health and safety protections. we would have a monitoring program in place to insure the integrity
for pier 70 be activity restrictions would be things that probably would not happen at pier 70 any way like rolling produce for consumption in native soil or allowing livestock grazing and native soil. ground water could not be used for domestic water supply, which at pier 70 it is failing ground water, and that would not be happening. ground water use would be limited to watering during construction. soil and groundwater would have to be managed in accordance with our risk management plan. the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
62
62
Mar 2, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 62
favorite 0
quote 0
pier 70 was really a marquee for the pier 70 project. it was up $5.2 million project installed at pier 27 that became operational in 2011. we put together funding for the project for a number of -- from a number of sources. there quality management district contributed 1.9 million to the project. the san francisco public utilities commission contributed 1.3 million, and usap and the port. we got it up and running, and we're turning around and shutting it down. the reason is construction of phase one of the cruise terminal, which is starting now. one of the first up in the project is decommissioning the shore power facilities so they can undertake demolition of the pier 27 shed it. as a result of the construction activity and the america's cup village concept, shoreside power will be out of commission from basically this month, february 2012-october 2013 when phase two of the cruise terminal construction project can start, along with reconnecting shore power at that location. that obviously creates a lot of air quality impacts and sequa p
pier 70 was really a marquee for the pier 70 project. it was up $5.2 million project installed at pier 27 that became operational in 2011. we put together funding for the project for a number of -- from a number of sources. there quality management district contributed 1.9 million to the project. the san francisco public utilities commission contributed 1.3 million, and usap and the port. we got it up and running, and we're turning around and shutting it down. the reason is construction of...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
92
92
Mar 7, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 92
favorite 0
quote 0
welcome to our america's cup center here at pier 80. i wanted to make some further announcements in light of the discussion that has been happening in our city on our america's cup event happening, starting this year, and will definitely have been in 2013 as well. i am here with stephen berkley, the head of the event authority. thank you to you and to jim and mike and our team for working intensely for months on the last few weeks, putting together the development agreement that is part of the investments on the america's cup, which oracle and others have been working on. the last couple of weeks, i have been a key participant with members of the board of supervisors but also engaged between our staff and the abet a party and corp. team staff, to try to get to all of the complex agreements that have to do with the investments. i will say, in light of those discussions, some of which have been written about extensively from all of you, i started to get the feeling that people were for getting help on this race is going to be for our city
welcome to our america's cup center here at pier 80. i wanted to make some further announcements in light of the discussion that has been happening in our city on our america's cup event happening, starting this year, and will definitely have been in 2013 as well. i am here with stephen berkley, the head of the event authority. thank you to you and to jim and mike and our team for working intensely for months on the last few weeks, putting together the development agreement that is part of the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
109
109
Mar 28, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 109
favorite 0
quote 0
the real driver here is piers 30-32. the minimum estimate for the time to complete the 30-32 improvements is about three months. walking through the timeline of the ordinance, if the board of supervisors has a first read on the ordinance, april 3, and then a second read april 10, the mayor could sign the ordinance as early as april 10. there is a 30-day window before the ordinance would become effective, bringing the dates to may 10. that is just a few days after we expect the issuance of a major permit for the piers 30-30 to work. we are still working with the regional water control board to make sure they can permit within that timeframe. and that is about the time when we expect to -- i think april 27 is the current due date for the final construction drawings. that would allow informally us to bid the work for 30-32 and potentially start the work around may 10. accounting for three months from may 10 -- that is in may, june, july, early august -- it is conceivable that we could have the 2012 world series event, the f
the real driver here is piers 30-32. the minimum estimate for the time to complete the 30-32 improvements is about three months. walking through the timeline of the ordinance, if the board of supervisors has a first read on the ordinance, april 3, and then a second read april 10, the mayor could sign the ordinance as early as april 10. there is a 30-day window before the ordinance would become effective, bringing the dates to may 10. that is just a few days after we expect the issuance of a...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
114
114
Mar 29, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 114
favorite 0
quote 0
i have talked about the piers 30-30 to work. starting with the public access improvements, we have a need to substantially rebuilt the pier 19. it is red-tagged, and it is supposed to be dedicated permit a public access. we estimate the cost of the project at $3 million. we are having to deliver pier 19 to the event authority by july 1, 2012. this construction activity is necessarily going to extend beyond that timeline. we do not have a firm completion date, but part of the purpose of the ordinance is to speed up our ability to get into a contract for this work so that we have less overlap between our construction activities and the event authority occupancy of the pier. the same issue relates to the pier 23 handrail on this slide, a $700,000 project. again, related to public access and making sure that people are safe. we would like to complete those construction activities as soon as possible. they are going to overlap the event authority's occupancy somewhat, but we would like to minimize that. with both of these projects, w
i have talked about the piers 30-30 to work. starting with the public access improvements, we have a need to substantially rebuilt the pier 19. it is red-tagged, and it is supposed to be dedicated permit a public access. we estimate the cost of the project at $3 million. we are having to deliver pier 19 to the event authority by july 1, 2012. this construction activity is necessarily going to extend beyond that timeline. we do not have a firm completion date, but part of the purpose of the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
115
115
Mar 29, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 115
favorite 0
quote 0
at pier 70, which is by -- $5.7 million. the epa and sfpuc combine forces for the project. the portland after the commission the project for construction services at pier 27. the eir requires the report, and the board in certifying the appeal of the eir also requires the port to install this shoreside project. even without the ordinance before you today, that particular strategy that we have crafted with the public utilities commission, this would be the option for the board to do. >supervisor avalos: eventually, we will have shoreside power at the cruise terminal and that will be reconditioned, correct?
at pier 70, which is by -- $5.7 million. the epa and sfpuc combine forces for the project. the portland after the commission the project for construction services at pier 27. the eir requires the report, and the board in certifying the appeal of the eir also requires the port to install this shoreside project. even without the ordinance before you today, that particular strategy that we have crafted with the public utilities commission, this would be the option for the board to do....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
56
56
Mar 28, 2012
03/12
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 56
favorite 0
quote 0
half and pier 64. these are old and need to be removed from the bay to improve the health of the bit, and finally, for the large spectator vessels and the catamarans, we are looking at a variety of dredging in four locations, although we expect that it will no longer be required to have dredging at pier 14 south. that would be a savings of over $300,000 compared to what you see on the slide. also, millions of dollars in capital projects. we have run through this scoring process using the standard criteria, and all of the projects got a score that merits funding without the america's cup, so we think these are good investments for the port to make. so as to the sources of funds, mike alluded to the fact that there will not be long-term leases, support will not be getting rent on a long-term basis, and the result of that would increase the ports bonding capacity, so we would propose issuing new debt in addition to new debt this year of $15 million, reallocating some existing debt that has not been extend
half and pier 64. these are old and need to be removed from the bay to improve the health of the bit, and finally, for the large spectator vessels and the catamarans, we are looking at a variety of dredging in four locations, although we expect that it will no longer be required to have dredging at pier 14 south. that would be a savings of over $300,000 compared to what you see on the slide. also, millions of dollars in capital projects. we have run through this scoring process using the...